012 Splits and Services with Winston Murray
Speaker 1 (00:01):
No matter where your business is today or where you want to take it, you'll get there faster and more profitably with an operating system. Welcome to Team Os, your guide to starting, growing and optimizing real estate team. Here's your host, Ethan Butte
Speaker 2 (00:16):
For insights into starting, growing and optimizing your real estate team. We're talking with Winston Murray. A few fun facts before we get started. He's a lifelong, deeply rooted in community-minded Portlander who's worked in construction management and nonprofit leadership. He's the founder and principal broker of Works Real Estate in Portland and in Seattle. Over the past few years, they've grown from four to about 140 agents. Thank you for talking Team Os today, Winston.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
Absolutely, Ethan. I'm happy to be here.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Awesome. I am looking forward to the growth story from four to 40. Some of the decisions that went into that, maybe how you would do it differently, what enabled it or what motivated it, but we'll start where we always do, which is a must have characteristic of a high performing team. When I ask or offer that, what comes to mind?
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Yeah, I think being relentless and determined no matter what. I think with that comes a lot of humility knowing that this is where, this is the direction you're aiming towards. You don't know exactly how you're going to get there, but you're going to figure it out as you go, and that requires a lot of humility. You can't have determination without being able to look at where you can improve at every next step to continue that growth. So yeah, humility has been this trigger word kind of my entire career where I was like, look, I don't know. I'm going to figure it out and I'm going to ask a lot of questions along the way, and I'm willing to constantly in reflect and figure out what we can do better. Okay, this is broken and it's going to break at every next step. So I've gotten really good at knowing that I don't know everything but willing to figure it out.
Speaker 2 (02:04):
I love that pairing of relentlessness and I think determination was also in there as well, blended with the humility and it's that where I've seen a lot of people struggle and fall down and basically I'm talking about myself too. Some expectation that it's just going to be successful, which is foolishness, and this idea that there's a humility to know that I don't know, I'm going to do my best here. I'm going to learn from it and keep going with some kind of relentlessness and determination to get it done. What drives you? So I don't think you and I ever talked specifically about your origin story as a team leader and the founder of Works Real Estate specifically, but my expectation is that you're probably one of those solo agents who was very successful and felt like, if I'm going to do what I need to do, I need to surround myself with more different people to leverage my time and these other things. Give a quick go at how you got there. I have a feeling of relentlessness as part of it.
Speaker 3 (03:05):
Yeah, I just kind of stumbled upon real estate. I did a lot of odd end jobs. I got involved with this kind of nonprofit and we were kind of restoring this old building and I always struggled in traditional school and test taking, and so I was kind of looking for my niche. Okay, I'm not good at school, but gosh, the first time my adult life I was like, wow, I feel smart. I can organize people and I can make something happen out of thin air by not necessarily out of thin air, but I can see a space and see what the potential is, whether it's in real estate or whether it's in community. And that feeling of feeling useful, feeling smart, feeling like I'm actually having an impact ultimately is what drives me. And then that led me to real estate and I was like, okay, I'm going to apply all of these learned lessons and all of my previous careers and jobs and roles into one. What better than real estate to create something out of nothing. It's a blank canvas. I find that I do a lot better in a blank canvas than in a box.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
How did you get started and when did you commit to creating your own brokerage?
Speaker 3 (04:31):
Yeah, so I got started, I've been selling real estate for about 12 years. I was a real estate agent, assistant slash transaction coordinator and transaction coordinator, and I ultimately got fired from that role after about a year. I'm no better at transaction coordination today than I was then. And then that led me to join a team at Keller Williams as a showing agent and then a buyer's agent. I did Ignite, I did bold, so I got a lot of good traditional training in that sense. First year license, I did 35 deals. And so I was like, okay, this is clear. I'm better in the front end of the house than the back end. I'm better at the sales side than the back end. And then after a couple years on the team, I went solo and actually the day I quit my team, I jumped out of a plane, I went skydiving for my friend's birthday, but just we weren't going to go because of the clouds.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
And then I couldn't take it anymore on the team. I was like, I'm just going to do this leap of faith. I'm going to quit my job. And then the skydiving company called me and they're like, Hey, the sky's cleared. You're ready to jump, come here in an hour. And so within two hours after quitting, I was jumping out of a plane. So that was a very memorable experience and very the universe just saying, take the leap, do it, go for it. And I did. And so that first year as a solo agent, I did about 40, 45 deals. And then I started to be like at first when I left, I was like, I don't need a team. I'm just going to be solo. If I could do 25 deals a year, that'd be great. And then quickly found out that okay, there's something to be set about having the right structure and support behind me to allow me to do what I do best, which is sell and connect.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
And so ultimately that's what led me to then start a team. And then I went from doing 40 deals a year to 50 to 60 to 70. I just looked again because no one in my office believed me that I actually sold 70 houses in one year, but I did and I have the proof for it. And then from there we got on Zillow Flex and Zillow Flex was on my radar a few years prior. So that was part of the motivation for me to get to a production level and a leverage point where we could actually handle increased volume. And so we got on Zillow Flex about three years ago with four as a four person real estate team. And in the last three years we've gone from four to 140.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
So that one 40, thank you for all of that. So that one 40 was driven in part by, we have all these opportunities, we like the arrangement that we have with the flex program. I'm sure you're also just by nature of increasing deals, probably also getting some natural SOI type deals or referrals as well on top of that. But on that journey, talk a little bit about the staff to support that. I mean, generalize, you don't need to go role by roll, but what areas did you look to support with full-time staff first, what sequence did you kind of start building the support for all of these agents to manage all of these deals? And would you recommend doing it in a different order in any way based on your experience?
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Probably, yeah. Well, the whole goal was how I got from as just a solo agent doing 35 to 70 deals a year, was all like, Hey, I'm going to go all in on Zillow and treat these clients like friends and family and do such a good job during the process and do just as good of a job staying in contact afterwards to multiply the impact, to leverage each opportunity with Zillow in the form of two or three more referrals within a year or two after that. And so having been on a team where I was only allowed to represent buyers and my name wasn't on the sign, I knew that when we started a team, we wanted to do a little bit different. So we definitely needed transaction coordination. We definitely needed some of the team back in marketing support, operation support. But the goal was to just, if I could help an agent that joins my team, build a similar business to what I built, then I know as a team we're going to really successful.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
So the whole idea behind our team structure was just that. It was like take the opportunity we have from Zillow and I want to help my agents build really strong referral-based businesses. And the support structures evolved quite a bit from four agents to 40, but ultimately those key components of just transaction coordination, listing support, and overarching marketing operations management support has been there the whole time. Even though the people are different, the role and the responsibilities might have shifted. And I quickly realized when we got onto Zillow Flex, it was like my biggest challenge all of a sudden was how do I keep up with the volume? How do I keep up with the amount of opportunities we had? So it was 2020, it was a boom market. The sky was literally falling leads and opportunities. And my biggest challenge as a team lead now a brokerage owner, was endless leads means nothing without quality control, and I don't want to hurt the business and the reputation that I've built just to go fast. So my first big challenge starting the brokerage was developing education for the agent to ensure that the conversations were right, the conversion was right, and ultimately we're going to protect the opportunity that we had.
Speaker 2 (10:26):
I think something that you're doing uniquely that makes this opportunity valuable to you and have been able to build a hundred plus agent brokerage on it is that you're seeing it as a long-term play. I think a lot of people say, these leads suck, those leads suck, these leads are good, those leads are bad. And it's very transactionally minded. Whereas what I heard you say was you're investing in this and co-creating these opportunities with a lead partner, in this case Zillow flex with the vision of building real relationships and turning them into 3, 4, 5, 6 transactions, which then makes the ROI incredible. I think a lot of people look at it much more myopically, which is just in this really tight window of I put in X or I had to give away Y and on this one transaction, I'm not valuing it correctly. So I said a lot there. I didn't really even ask a single question,
Speaker 3 (11:14):
But I I'm following. I have a lot to Yeah,
Speaker 2 (11:15):
I know you are. Yeah,
Speaker 3 (11:17):
A lot to talk about there. I mean, I want to back up though. If I were to hire in a different order, I probably would've added a lead manager and an additional kind of recruiting department or person to really help streamline that. In the beginning, I didn't really do that. It was just like sky's falling. If you've got a phone computer and a license, I'll teach you how to do it. And as long as you can pick up the phone, we're going to be good. But I'll back up even further than that. I mean, when I was at Keller Williams, I was on a team that saw the opportunity in the online space, but the level of service I didn't believe matched like a traditional referral based agent. It was kind of geared towards more burn and turn style business. And then when I left, after I jumped out of the plane, I went to a smaller boutique brokerage.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
No one had a CRM, no one did any advertising. And it was eyeopening for me to see the volume that these agents were doing simply by just taking care of their client, doing right in the transaction and doing just as good of a job, staying in contact after the fact. And so as a millennial entering the industry, I was 22, I didn't have a lot of friends in a position to buy, but I was used to doing 35 deals a year. So Zillow just seemed like a no brainer to scale my referral based business and ultimately merge those two worlds together. And I saw a huge divide in all of what I perceived to be the best of the best realtors who are truly taking care of their client, being really resistant to this inevitable change in the industry driven by the client demand. And so for me, I saw a huge opportunity to kind of merge this new leverage tech opportunity that's kind of this inevitable change with this old school mentality and still to this day, more than ever maybe there's a huge divide and at the end of the day, it's about relationships, and that's what you said.
Speaker 3 (13:20):
And Zillow, op city, realtor, home life open door, there's so many different tech companies now that are inserting themselves between the agent and the client, but at the end of the day, the client remembers the agent and no matter what change happens in the future of the industry, I knew that it was still going to be so focused on relationships. And that's what gave me the ultimate confidence to continue down that path, which there was no guarantee that it was going to be successful or not. There still isn't still building it. Who knows what's going to happen and we'll continue to adjust along the way.
Speaker 2 (14:01):
So much good stuff in there, and I say this from time to time, but that is why especially if you're listening to a podcast player, you have that 30 or 60 or 92nd back button, by the way, if it's Apple Podcasts, you can change how far you jump back, but that's why we have the jump back button. I think what you're doing, Winston is so powerful and you explain it so simply too, and it's simple in concept, which is this is about relationships and referrals, how a lot of folks are treating digital and online generated opportunities is a bit too transactional. Let's find a way to treat those people better as if they're going to be long-term friends and neighbors of ours and have it net out in the end. I
Speaker 3 (14:43):
Always say, if you can meet your husband or wife online, then you definitely can meet your realtor online. These are real people and they deserve real service.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
And I love that language too. They deserve more than what on average we've been giving them. And frankly, I mean the more that we treat people a particular way as a culture or as a habit or as an industry or as a subset of an industry, the more people come to expect that that's what it is. And so I think it's important to continue to raise the bar in different ways and in different places. I know it's a little bit cliche to say, but it's absolutely true.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Well, that really leads us to where we're at today is ultimately I think a lot of these teams that are benefiting from opportunities online have a high turnover and it is not their agent's name on the sign, it's the team leader and that agent doesn't get credit for their work. And so in a lot of ways we're trying to reformat what a traditional real estate team looks like, and it's this instilled ownership in our agent's business that ultimately allows us to continue to attract and retain top talent, which in the eyes of Zillow and all these other partnerships that we have, it is a lot easier for us to help perform at a high level and retain top talent if we're instilling ownership in their business. Hey, we want to help you build just as strong of a business as I built. And the best way to do that is to take care of the client to get repeat business and referrals. So that language in itself is so counter to how most real estate teams in my experience are run and it's allowed us to stay ahead of the game.
Speaker 2 (16:28):
Congratulations on your success to date. Thank you for sharing that. And I want to go to a zone that you and I talked about that on a previous call that I know is a constant challenge for every team leader, no matter how they're operating, no matter how they're training people to manage online leads and opportunities specific to our conversation up to this point, and this is really that crux of splits versus services. How do we make sure that we're creating a unique and powerful environment where agents have a great work life balance and they're also producing higher than they were in whatever previous iteration they were in, such that they want to stay and continue to learn and grow with us. We want to provide services, but we also need to do this profitably. And all of the levers around that are shifting all of the time, costs are changing, opportunities are changing the numbers that we have in a particular model that are suggesting if we put 20% more in, we'll get 35% more out.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
Well, that doesn't hold all the time over time because so much is changing. So I'd love for you to just kind of introduce how you thought about splits versus, and then I think another place we might go over time is the fear a lot of agents have about joining a team because they look at the split and they're like, oh, that's shocking on its face, but they don't understand the other side of the splits versus services dynamic, but let's stay in your seat as a team leader. How did you think about that when you were first setting up? How do you think about that today? How has the shift in the market affected this dynamic for you? I know it's something you spent a lot of time and energy and thought and care on. I know we've had to make some challenging decisions around it too. So just kind of set us up on your philosophy around splits and services and maybe how that's changed over the past several years.
Speaker 3 (18:20):
Yeah, I mean, just since starting the brokerage, I think we've adjusted service and splits four times in the last three years, which isn't easy to do and every time it's done, it shocks the culture for sure. The market's also changed and we've changed. We've grown quite a bit. I mean, when we were 20 people, we were at a 50 50 split across the board regardless of the source. We did a success fee referral fee off the top and then the 50 50 split if it was company gen. That's the only thing that hasn't changed. We're on a 50 50 split for any company gen after any referral fee that comes out off the top on SOI business. We started at 50 50. We weren't able to retain agents when the market shifted and then we've incrementally brought that up to a 60 40. But every time we've done that, we've had to take back some of our services.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
We used to install lockboxes and directionals and coordinate staging and schedule styling and get bids for recommended repairs. We used to do way too much on the listing side, which wasn't too much at the time. It was great. It was a high level service. It protected our brand. It also protected our reputation because some of our agents were newer and this really helped kind of facilitate a good experience for the client regardless of how experienced the agent was. But yeah, I mean obviously it's changed a lot in the last year and a half. Today we're at a 70 30, so if an agent has had experience coming in, they start at a 70 30 on any SLI business and then again, agent gen or company gen is at a 50 50. And then as that agent increases their production, so at 15 units maintained in a rolling 12, they go up to a 75 25 and then for agents doing 25 or more unit and there's a volume threshold tied to it depending on the average price point for the market, then they go up to an 80 20 if they're maintaining 25 units or more in that same rolling 12 measured every quarter with a six month grace period, knowing that not every quarter is going to look the same.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
But this really has allowed us to onboard agents with a three year growth trajectory where ultimately, regardless of their level of experience, our only culture fit is I don't care if you sold one house or a hundred houses as long as you a willingness to learn and grow. That's what makes our culture, our culture. And so we want to see our agents become incrementally less dependent on our lead sources year after year. If it's a brand new agent has never sold anything, they start at a 60 40 until they've done eight deals and then automatically their SOI business goes up to a 73 and any company generated business counts towards those first eight as well. And so ideally we're looking at a brand new agent joining at a 60 40. They do eight deals in their first year. Next year they're at a 70 30. The year after that, they're at a 75 25 year. After that, they're at an 80 20 and every year they've seen a 20% increase in their SOI business. And obviously the splits are greater. At 80 20, they're going to see they're going to be making 200 to 300 grand by their third or fourth year and still have a lot of support and leverage on the backend.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Okay, first of all, thank you for that detail. That's fantastic and very specific. It's a great story to be able to tell whether it is a brand new agent or someone with a little bit more experience. There's something that you're constantly working toward. It's very clear. Your definitions were very clear and I can see how it would be motivating and inspiring to someone. Let's go to the other side of that. In terms of the services that you provide, in terms of when you realized that you were overdelivering and or the market had moved out from underneath, let's do all the staging and some of the other things that you mentioned, what was that process like? I want to kind of get into two parts of that process because I'm sure some folks watching or listening are in the middle of something like this or have been thinking about it.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
They need to, which is one, what was the process for kind of weighing out cost benefit on maybe a service by service base? Were there some, obviously these three things need to go and you maybe wrestled over, do we keep doing this or do we scale that back a little bit? So how do you evaluate the services? Maybe who is involved? And then after that, we'll maybe get into, because you mentioned the disruption to the culture, how did you communicate that to the agents the couple of times that you've had to do it, and maybe how did you do it differently, the second or third time versus the first? So start with that first half of that, which is how did you evaluate which services were necessary, appropriate, useful, good cost benefit, fit where you wanted the company to go? How did you evaluate the services from a cost benefit perspective?
Speaker 3 (23:18):
Yeah, I mean, the most costly thing to an agent is time. And so for me, when I was selling 70 houses a year, I didn't have any time. I did that with a fraction of the support our agents have now at the brokerage. And if really looking at what you make in a year and breaking it down to how many hours you're working in a week and what is your hourly wage really helps me and any other agent look at, okay, is designing a flyer the best use of my time? There should never be a time where we're not available to meet the client because we're styling our latest listing. That's not the best use of my time, nor is it what the client is hiring me to do. Right? We hire a stager or a stylist for that. We hire landscapers for landscaping, just like I'm not going to get in a crawl space during the showing.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
It's not what I'm here to do. And I think agents have the tendency to pretend to be an expert in title in lending and contracting and insurance. And the agent doesn't actually do anything. They do everything. They organize everyone involved in the process. But as a solo agent, I found the best use of my time is being available to the client, making sure their offer gets accepted and protecting them within inspections. And same for sellers is ultimately making sure the home is prepared in the best way, utilizing our list of vendors and protecting them within negotiations. And that's it, right? I don't need to be everywhere all the time. I'm going to definitely make sure your offer gets accepted. I'm definitely going to protect you with inspections. And so when we're stepping back as a brokerage, we're going to do all their paperwork that protects us, meaning they write the offer, but we're taking it all the way to closing.
Speaker 3 (25:17):
We're opening escrow, we're sending out earnest money instructions, we're communicating with the lender. Our agents are highly leveraged on the transaction coordination side. And then in terms of listing support goes, this is kind of our biggest shift. We were doing staging photo. We pay for photos, videos, matterport, 30 tours, floor plans, drone photography, videography, drone videography. We're doing everything and we pay for that. That comes out of our split regardless of the source. And from a quality control standpoint, we didn't really want to get rid of that. We didn't want any of our agents taking bad phone photos of the listing. That hurts our reputation. So paperwork and marketing are done for the agent. I'd say one of the biggest mistakes was that when we were new, we hired, I had 30 staff at one point and we just didn't need that many staff. But because we were growing so fast, we felt like we needed that many more bodies just to build the infrastructure.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
And I look back on it now, we're 10 times the amount of agents we had, and we're only a third of the staff that we started with. The staff that we have now are a lot of the same staff we started with. It's like, okay, we didn't actually need all these extra layers, but we felt like we did at the time because we were just trying to move really fast, build everything fast. And now that it's built, we've been able to scale back the amount of staff that we have on payroll to support our agents. So we're highly leveraged in that all of our support for our agents is virtual support. Not necessarily all of our staff are virtual assistants, but some of them are. And by drawing that line in the sand, it's allowed us to also expand outside of our geographic range to help offset this market shift or look, we have to expand into these other markets. Even though it might be a lower price point, there's still higher dollar volume movement for first time home buyers in those other tertiary markets outside of our core Portland and Seattle market.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
You just teed up a place I wanted to go anyway, so I'll follow you there or we'll move there. How did you choose Seattle and what other markets are you looking at and what is for anyone who is operating a team, no matter the size, whether it's six or 65, any tips for geographic expansion? I mean, and Seattle probably are culturally similar, but there are nuances. Obviously it's not the same, it's not the same city, it's not the same market, et cetera. They're also not an hour up the road from one another or down the road, vice versa. There is a commitment. So talk a little bit about how you thought about which markets were the right fit for you and maybe some tips for people that are thinking about going that direction.
Speaker 3 (28:16):
Yeah, there's always been a lot of cross reciprocation between Seattle to Portland. We have an agent in Bend as well as kind of the specific Northwest Bermuda triangle of movement, whether it's like someone starts in Seattle and they move down to Portland and then they retire in Bend and then sell their condo in Seattle. So there was already a lot of referrals going back and forth. So geographically it just made sense for me as a solo agent, I always prided myself on being from the city. I grew up here from the area I'm involved in the community, and it was hard for me to imagine selling houses actively outside of this market. And for me, I'm like, oh, a house is a house and we have a really good system of training, educating agents and making sure that the quality controls there. So once I felt like our level of service was up to par to actually be introduced to a new market, it was a no brainer. And now I'm like, okay, where else can we go? That makes sense.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Yeah, and that's probably in part enabled by the tightening of the core staff moving some of it virtual is probably helpful in this. Any other factors involved in doing it successfully? And I guess as a layer on there, what staff positions do you recommend to be local or as you're thinking about the next geographic market or whether it's Seattle or whatever's next, what do you think is important to be local and onsite and what isn't?
Speaker 3 (29:55):
The only person we have on staff there is like a sales manager. They're also in production. And so someone that the agents can go to answer Seattle real estate specific questions. But then we also have a managing principal broker who's licensed in both states that they can call. So we have about three sales managers, any agent in any market can reach out to. And then the biggest thing is we're in many ways a virtual brokerage because most of the support that we offer is virtual, but we have about 10 hours of continued education and coaching and workshops that happen on Google Meet every week. And so although we're a virtual brokerage, it sure doesn't feel like it because any agent from any market can tap into that very relevant market conversation, which is mostly led by the agents. I'm leading it, but I'm just prompting questions to get our agents to start sharing stories of successes or challenges that they're having. And this has allowed us to be highly leveraged, virtual, allow for expansion and have it feel still very personal and intimate for the agents
Speaker 2 (31:14):
So that they feel like they're A connected, and B, getting a high level of service.
Speaker 3 (31:20):
And we've done a lot of, I think we've had a lot of success with just leasing co-working spaces that allows us to not be locked into a five-year lease. We can start in a two person office and then as we grow, we can continue to move down the hall and get into a bigger space until we can afford to buy in that market.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
Really good. I want to double back for a minute to communicating when you have to change some of the services and splits, what was the communication process there? I think a lot of people would be, it's an art and a skill to be able to communicate why this is good for everyone, when in fact it might look or feel on its face, you're getting less. How did you manage that? Did you test any of the communication with agents? Were they involved in any of that process? How did that go for you?
Speaker 3 (32:17):
Yeah, we definitely had some of our top producers weigh in at every level, but at a certain point it's just like, look, we know we have to pull back on these services, otherwise we're going to go out of business. We have to do this. When the market was shifting as fast as it was, regardless of the optics, we knew what we had to do. I think we've done a good job adjusting services at the same time, increasing the split on SOI business in favor of the agent. So hey, you're not going to get this, but in return we're going to give you this. And it's tough when you do the most on the listing side because for a year, one, two or three agent that doesn't have a bigger mix of listing business coming in, they're like, well, why am I paying for this? And I don't have listings, so I didn't get staging done on my listing or whatever.
Speaker 3 (33:09):
Just scaling back our services to a point where no one feels like only listing agents are getting special attention. I think it was part of that kind of change. And I feel like we're in a really good spot now, and there's not a lot I would change at this point from a profitability standpoint, we're very profitable at a 50 50 split, and it's really hard to do projections when you have some of your agents on a 70 30, some of your agents are on 80 20. So we are constantly just looking at the mix of business coming in, what's our source this month? This month right now in November, we're a lot more reliant on these online leads than we were the rest of the year because I think a lot of referral based business is somewhat seasonal too. So I will say too, we have a lot of agents who aren't taking any company who haven't taken any company generated leads all year and are running really strong referral-based businesses, but now their pipeline of referrals is starting to slow and they're like, Hey, turn me on to Zillow or whatever it may be to supplement my referral-based business.
Speaker 3 (34:22):
And ultimately that's what we want. If I could have a hundred really strong referral-based agents who are not fully reliant on Zillow, they're the agents who are converting three to four times the amount of a one or two year newer agent.
Speaker 2 (34:37):
Yeah, I think that's another part of the equation we were talking about earlier is converting online leads. I think a lot of people look at benchmarks or norms that are broad across the industry and say like, oh, okay, well we're doing benchmark, but that's not sufficient. And I think the mindset that you articulated earlier in this conversation is probably baked into the training that you're doing blended with an experienced agent converting at a much higher rate.
Speaker 3 (35:10):
Yeah, absolutely. I, and I've experienced this for myself, I was that agent on a team that was like, I don't need a team. I want the full commission and I'm going to jump out of the plane and start my own thing. And oh, I didn't not know what I was getting into, but I was willing to figure it out. And ultimately, as a team lead brokerage owner, I've had many agents leave now and I always have to ask, okay, why? What else can we do to make sure that we're attracting this talent? But for an agent who doesn't see the value of time yet in their career, an extra 10% on that one listing they have means a lot to them and it makes sense. But gosh, if I could just help them fast forward five years, I think they would reflect back and be like, okay, I had it pretty good.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
And so we have this recently we created this comp worksheet part of goal setting, just how many hours do you want to work, how many deals do you want to do, how many buy side, how many sell side, how many from the company, how many from you generated by the agent? And this has really helped our business strategy conversations and get our agents to look at the value of their time saved. And we actually have a comparison with a cap model on it, like an $18,000 cap model, and we can plug in TC support. So if you leave and you want to go start your own thing, these are the costs that you're going to take on. And then without all the company generated business, they're netting more every time in our model. But I think a lot of agents think, oh, in order to double my income, I got to double the amount of hours that I'm putting into it and it's not necessarily true.
Speaker 3 (37:00):
And so I think what we're trying to do is just really help our agents learn early on the value of leverage, time, leverage, whether you're paying per showing for that extra support. An agent on average, a client looks at 10 homes before finding one house. And if I'm an agent, it's worth paying 50 bucks per 10, that's $500 for every closing to buy back 75% of my time to double or triple my production and out the gate. I think a lot of team leads and brokerage owners can teach people how to sell houses, but we're really focused on helping empower our agents to build really strong real estate businesses to last as what it's like 90% of people fail within five years. We normalize that. We want to talk about that. That means they got to do what 90% of people aren't willing to do.
Speaker 2 (37:51):
Yeah, and it's so interesting too. I mean, offer leverage is the keyword in all of that versus linear. I mean, you offered a linear thing, well, if I wanted two x, then I needed two x that it's not linear directly to get it done. Totally unrelated to anything we've covered so far, when you opted to start the brokerage, why independent did you weigh going with another brand or a franchise? How did you think about that?
Speaker 3 (38:22):
Yeah, I did. One of my early mentors in real estate said this, and I can't get out of my head. Whoever has the leads wins. If you got the leads, it doesn't matter, right? The service is there, you got the business coming in, it doesn't matter. I wanted a lot of flexibility in creating our own structure. This is new. I knew that creating a brokerage to support the volume of online business to the industry in itself is relatively new. And doing it at a massive scale beyond just like a five 10 person team, that's where it starts, but the margins aren't there enough as it is. I didn't want to pay another cap per agent on top of that, and I wanted more flexibility and building out these different mechanisms of support. And even though one brokerage might offer some of these services that we already cover and there's a cost savings, I think from a reputation quality control standpoint, we knew we had a really good set of transaction coordinators like the best in the west, and ultimately we wanted to lean into the relationships we had already had as well.
Speaker 2 (39:40):
Awesome. Another kind of on its own type of question, I'll just pick up on the word relationships there you are on the advisory board of both the Zillow agent advisory board, the CISO advisory board. How do these opportunities open up to you and what is valuable about that time spent for you personally?
Speaker 3 (40:02):
Great question. Again, going back to it's not real estate, I just love creating something out of nothing. I love building, I love the relationships. I love the day-to-day struggles and then overcoming that and whether it's real estate or not, I definitely see the industry transforming quite a bit. And it is Uber versus yellow taxi, it's the same thing, and it has been happening, but it seems to be exponentially speeding up in the industry. And 10 years ago as a millennial entering the industry, I just knew that the industry was disjointed and had a lot of room for improvement. I could be one of the ones who are like, oh, the industry sucks and everything sucks, but I'm like, that's where the opportunity is. There's so much opportunity to make this better for agents and for clients too. So the whole idea of tech enabling that change and being the driving force behind that change with the client demand for a more transparent experience, turning the lights on in the industry just made sense to me as a consumer and as an agent.
Speaker 3 (41:17):
And so I've been working with Zillow for about 10 years and I was buying leads when they're less than a hundred dollars a connection. And just the price of a connection alone I think is a good indicator on the demand for an easier, more efficient experience for the agent and the client. And so getting an opportunity to be on the advisory board has been a tenure play. And to be quite honest, we got rejected out of Flex originally because I wasn't leveraged. I was the one that was performing the most, so I knew that I needed to work on leverage and systems and training and recruiting.
Speaker 3 (42:03):
They ended up calling me back a couple months later and they're like, all right, you're in. You got a shot, run with it. And boy did we run with it, but I wanted to be a part of the conversation. I'm passionate about it, I'm excited about it. I've seen what it's done to my business. I'm also really passionate ultimately about this divide. It's like in my experience, you had some of the not so best agents benefiting from this opportunity, and then you have the best of the best agents really resistant to it. And so I'm really passionate about proving that you can run a really strong referral based agent and keep the heart and the soul of what it means to be an entrepreneur and a realtor in this industry while adapting to new technology. And actually it'll make your life a little bit easier too.
Speaker 3 (42:55):
And then CISO is kind of a dream software in my mind. It replaces the traditional whiteboard and real estate, and I loved all the data points that Zillow gives. Each data point, whether it's appointment set, met with work with client satisfaction, each of those data points is a different coaching conversation for a team leader or a brokerage owner to have as a means of continued value for their agents. But it didn't like that it was only for that set of clients. I wanted our agents to have that level of data and insight into their business for all of their SOI business as well. And so I found that sisu is a place where we can track both of, we can track everybody the same regardless of the source of business. Everybody deserves the same experience and then especially the agent, this is part of our retention and recruiting and this instilled ownership is we're going to empower you to run a strong business by providing the tools you need to do it
Speaker 2 (43:57):
Really good. I heard in both responses, the front half and the back half themes of transparency and control. In one case, you want to honor the transparency and control that the consumers expect throughout the experience. And on the other side, you want to empower your agents both from a recruiting, retention and business growth standpoint with transparency and control over how they're generating business and how it's going. I really appreciate how well you articulated that you're still selling or still listing properties a bit. It's a little bit of what I generally hear for team leaders like you who've grown a team past a hundred agents is I like to stay in touch with what's going on in the market. It allows me to maybe coach a little bit differently. It maybe gives me a little bit of cred among the team members. He's not just out doing whatever the hobby is. And anything unique about it for you besides those kind of core themes that we tend to hear from folks that are still opting to participate in the market very directly?
Speaker 3 (45:01):
Yeah, I mean I think it goes along with our name. It's like I'm running workshops and if there's a day where I'm in a position to not do those things, then it might be a little different. But I don't see myself stopping working and stopping being in it. Especially now with the market shift. I knew that I had to jump fully in. I'm on workshops, I'm running the brokerage meeting, I'm in it. And I think that I'm still so new to this and I mean I'm 12 years in, seven years running a team, three years running a brokerage. But I have a lot to learn still. And I don't think I've reached that point in my career where I can sit back, especially with the shift in the market, I want to show my agents how to work and the work ethic in itself. And I think I have this kind of old school work ethic.
Speaker 3 (45:58):
I had a lot of Mr. Miyagis who just kicked my butt and maybe do it again and again and again and again. And I don't have a hard time working. And I want our agents to see that everything you want in this industry can happen if you believe it can happen and you're willing to actually work for it. And that's what I love about this industry so much is that it gave me a second chance. I didn't go to a four year college. I didn't go to business school. I helped start a nonprofit and I was a volunteer for 30 hours a week for four years, and that was my four year college education. And it helped me learn how to start something out of nothing. And just by pure will and work ethic, I've seen miracles happen. Things that I envisioned came true and it wasn't just me. I have a great team backing me and a lot of people who believe in that, but I wish I could just shake our agent sometimes and be like, whatever you want can happen if you're willing to work for it. And so part of that is just the time in the market and just who I am, but I'm the first one in last one to leave and I want to show people how to make dreams come true.
Speaker 2 (47:16):
Man, I appreciate so much of what you just shared there. It reminds me too, by the way, for folks watching or listening, Phil Gerus in one of our fcon sessions talks very specifically about he left production, got back in, and he spoke to the modeling thing that you shared there too, which was like when I got back into production, my agents really got back into production. What it was was the modeled behavior like, oh, this is how we're going to really work hard. And then a little more recently with Daniel Dixon, we talked about this kind of the middle way. I mean, leverage is a bit about working smarter, but you also still have to work hard too. It's not one or the other. It's both up the middle. And I heard that coming from you as well. It's really good. I would love for you, I promise we won't run long or much longer, but I would love for you to share a little bit about the nonprofit that you helped build because I think it's important work and I felt like there was some heart in what you were just sharing there about I assume that some of the miracles happening isn't just the real estate business, it's probably the lives that organization is transforming.
Speaker 3 (48:25):
Yeah, it's called the Fourth Dimension Recovery Center. When I was in 20, I got in trouble. I got a DUI had to get sober and much like many young adults run into some trouble early on in their life, I ended up getting pretty connected in young people who were sober. And at the time, I felt like I was the only one in Portland. And I quickly realized I wasn't, but there wasn't, wasn't a lot of spaces that were conducive for young adults who aren't partying at the time. And so ultimately I found this old warehouse through a previous employer. I was like, Hey, can we just hang out here? And eventually he was like, what are you guys doing? You guys all are sober. You should start a nonprofit. I was like, okay, cool. Let's do it. So it was one of those moments where I was like, ah, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (49:19):
We'll figure it out. And that was a totally grassroots effort. I think our first fundraiser was we raised $1,300 to file our 5 0 1 C3 nonprofit status. That was 10 years ago. They probably have four locations now. And whole concept is this peer-to-peer support system of helping peers recover from whatever it is, specifically youth in recovery. And so we do a lot of work with treatment centers around town, but the whole idea is that we can just hang out with 'em and have a normal life and have introduce them to a community of other like-minded individuals. And funny story, a lot of, we ended up getting a grant through the county for peer mentor support services, and that led to us getting more grants and I think there's four locations. There's probably 70 staff potentially now I think, and each one of those locations has a hundred different people in it each day.
Speaker 3 (50:28):
And just that in itself was such a boost of confidence for me starting at the same time I was starting my real estate career. I was like, all right, cool. We're going to make something magic happen in real estate now. And it's funny because where we did all of our mentor certification for that, the owner of that building called me two years ago and was like, Hey, I need help selling my building. We were in a position where we were growing pretty quick and I was like, Hey, we want to buy that building. So that building, we totally remodeled and is now our real estate office. So it was a total full circle moment where those two worlds collided. But a lot of the same business skills and entrepreneurial skills I learned there, I'm applying and more into the real estate business.
Speaker 2 (51:15):
That's beautiful. I'm so glad that I asked and I appreciate you sharing that. I love your story. I love what you're up to. I wish you continued success. I congratulate you on making hard decisions at times when you have to make hard decisions. And I appreciate too, the way you bottom line is like, listen, if we want this thing to keep going, we need to make these hard decisions, not regardless of what agents think. I mean, you handled that gracefully as well by involving some of your top producers in the conversation, but ultimately you have to do what you have to do. Anyway, this has been awesome. Before I let you go though, I have three fun pairs of questions. I think they're fun. Anyway, I hope you do too. The first pair is what is your very favorite team besides the works real estate team or what is the best team you've ever been a member of? Besides works?
Speaker 3 (52:02):
Yeah, just being on the a b with Zillow, I've really become close with Elmer e Holmes in California, Levi Rogers in Texas. Look up to those guys a ton. Just following what Jason Mitchell's built has been really inspiring as well. So it's a combination of those things.
Speaker 2 (52:23):
Awesome. Levi Rogers is coming up soon and maybe the other two will as well. What is one of your most frivolous purchases or what's a cheapskate habit you hold onto even though you probably don't need to?
Speaker 3 (52:37):
I had the best shopping spree of furniture for our office. Again, we're very design centric. We wanted to make sure the office doesn't feel like Ikea fully, so I went deep on just like 1960s futurism kind of furniture, and we went all out on our office furniture. But actually for the brand, it worked great. It's definitely a good place for creating content and it represents us and who we are, but I could have held back a little bit more.
Speaker 2 (53:11):
That's cool. It's good. I could have held because I was like, this all sounds very practical. And then, yeah, maybe you could held back. That's great. What does it look like for you to invest your time and attention in learning, growing and developing, or what does it look like for you to invest time in resting, relaxing and recharging?
Speaker 3 (53:31):
I'll answer the first one because I haven't quite figured the second one out yet. But just hungry for knowledge, always seeing what's coming up next, and always seeking out mentors at all levels, and again, staying humble, willing to learn at all levels.
Speaker 2 (53:52):
Awesome. If anyone wants to connect with you, learn more about what you're up to, where would you send people?
Speaker 3 (53:58):
You can check out works Real Estate Co on Instagram would be a good place. You can find me on LinkedIn, Winston Murray or my Instagram is Winston Murray one.
Speaker 2 (54:11):
Awesome. Those are all linked up. Wherever you are watching or listening to this episode, they're linked up right down below. Winston, again, thank you so much for doing this. I appreciate you and I wish you continued success.
Speaker 3 (54:22):
Thank you so much, Ethan. Appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (54:24):
Thanks for checking out this episode of Team Os. Get quick insights all the time by checking out real estate team Os on Instagram and on TikTok.